This was an Appeal by Alexander Katunin (the “Appellant”) against the refusal by the First Instance Judge to set aside alternative service on him, his finding that the Appellant had submitted to the jurisdiction by applying for an extension of time in which to file his defence (the “jurisdiction point”), and the Learned Judge’s refusal to grant a stay of the BVI proceedings alternatively to decline to exercise the Court’s jurisdiction under Rule 9.7A of the ECSC CPR. The Appellant also contended that the Respondent, JSC VTB Bank (the “Respondent”) waived the right to raise the jurisdiction point by not doing so earlier in the proceedings and particularly at the time when the Appellant made its application for an extension of time to file its defence.
In allowing the Appeal, the Court of Appeal held that for conduct to amount to a waiver, the conduct must be inconsistent with the right which is said to be waived. The failure on the part of the Respondent to raise the jurisdiction point earlier in the proceedings, did not amount to waiver or estoppel on those facts since that conduct of the Bank was not inconsistent with the right to take the submission point.
To continue reading full articles in PDF format:
Alexander Katunin and Jsc Vtb Bank BVIHCMAP 2015/0004 and BVIHCVAP 2015/0007